are the talk of the week. I have to say that my anger, far from decreasing, is growing day by day. The facts are as follows: El Pais, the newspaper that is losing quality, ethics and good taste at a rapid pace (opened with the cock closed spliced \u200b\u200bBerlusconi's Friend), published on Monday a showing pornographic pictures sex on the street, next to the Boqueria market Barcelona . Some Nigerian prostitutes were penetrated by white boys and young men, and others are practiced fellatio. It is so obvious that I do not want to argue why they are demeaning to these women (even if your eyes are deleted), for the rest of prostitutes and all women. Also for men with a modicum of sensitivity.
Just a comparison: the newspapers show corpses of Afghanistan's 11-M. Similarly, it would be unthinkable to show people that we recognize as the same being sodomized (with all that the idea of \u200b\u200b"being given by ass" symbolized in this society) and blowjobs. It shows these because they belong to the homogeneous and threatening "other." Are "other", have nothing to do with us, are not good citizens but illegal black whores, so we infrahumanize and humiliate all it takes to line the cost of their misery.
was accompanied by a report that prostitution was just a matter of public policy. All sources, members of neighborhood associations to whom the rights of these women are matter very little, to get these uncivil advocated road scenes. Obliquely cited the whores can be in many cases victims of trafficking. They were not given voice, and those members of neighborhood associations offering miracle solutions we illustrate how to create self-managed cooperatives. The johns or spoke, though it is clear that there is no supply without demand. This unfortunate
infraperiodístico product has reopened as the country now boasted an equally unfortunate in editorial, the debate about how out of the way to the whores. The johns do not bother us, no, although it is used to take a powder sad those which, due to the multiple discrimination suffered by the being female, immigrant, poor, black, paperless, found in prostitution one of the few ways to survive. We bothered them. Just because of all that, because immigrant women, poor, black and undocumented that disfigure our streets. And sometimes even steal is repeated insistently.
mafias we care a little more, but no victims, no, (to whom open orders expulsion of all forms and are required to cooperate with the police for protection), but as a pretext to further develop policies fardar repressive police effectiveness. The debate we are seeing is terrible. Solution is claimed to be police tipping over in applying the Immigration Act to punish them. That is, as we can not stop them for being whores, stop for not having papers. Wing, so we should not complicate our lives and decide between abolition and regulation.
A debate-the abolition vs. regulation-has been overcome by reality, of course, since 90% of prostitutes are illegal immigrants. That is, in the case of legalized prostitution, this 90% only benefit in the following way: could make a job offer in a hostess club to try and regularized through the social roots, a process that demands have been irregular status in Spain for three years.
words, those who want to work for others will do it first for three years in the underground economy. Three years in the best, because when you open a deportation order back to the beginning of the process. The beneficiaries are once again pimps and johns. To exercise on their own, an immigrant would have to win roles in some way, and then become self-justifying his business and others. Somewhat impractical for a whore, go.
The conclusion is clear: the debate is the Aliens Act. Yes, yes, that is used against prostitution that feeds it. Is reducing the output immigrant women's labor, which the mafia throws unable to migrate independently, the brakes when they are raised to denounce their exploiters and abusers. An Immigration Act passed with the approval of most political and labor groups, and that much of the public calls for tightening. That is the frame. To those who defend it and allowed to talk about the rights of immigrant women and victims of trafficking they should drop their heads in shame.
Just a comparison: the newspapers show corpses of Afghanistan's 11-M. Similarly, it would be unthinkable to show people that we recognize as the same being sodomized (with all that the idea of \u200b\u200b"being given by ass" symbolized in this society) and blowjobs. It shows these because they belong to the homogeneous and threatening "other." Are "other", have nothing to do with us, are not good citizens but illegal black whores, so we infrahumanize and humiliate all it takes to line the cost of their misery.
was accompanied by a report that prostitution was just a matter of public policy. All sources, members of neighborhood associations to whom the rights of these women are matter very little, to get these uncivil advocated road scenes. Obliquely cited the whores can be in many cases victims of trafficking. They were not given voice, and those members of neighborhood associations offering miracle solutions we illustrate how to create self-managed cooperatives. The johns or spoke, though it is clear that there is no supply without demand. This unfortunate
infraperiodístico product has reopened as the country now boasted an equally unfortunate in editorial, the debate about how out of the way to the whores. The johns do not bother us, no, although it is used to take a powder sad those which, due to the multiple discrimination suffered by the being female, immigrant, poor, black, paperless, found in prostitution one of the few ways to survive. We bothered them. Just because of all that, because immigrant women, poor, black and undocumented that disfigure our streets. And sometimes even steal is repeated insistently.
mafias we care a little more, but no victims, no, (to whom open orders expulsion of all forms and are required to cooperate with the police for protection), but as a pretext to further develop policies fardar repressive police effectiveness. The debate we are seeing is terrible. Solution is claimed to be police tipping over in applying the Immigration Act to punish them. That is, as we can not stop them for being whores, stop for not having papers. Wing, so we should not complicate our lives and decide between abolition and regulation.
A debate-the abolition vs. regulation-has been overcome by reality, of course, since 90% of prostitutes are illegal immigrants. That is, in the case of legalized prostitution, this 90% only benefit in the following way: could make a job offer in a hostess club to try and regularized through the social roots, a process that demands have been irregular status in Spain for three years.
words, those who want to work for others will do it first for three years in the underground economy. Three years in the best, because when you open a deportation order back to the beginning of the process. The beneficiaries are once again pimps and johns. To exercise on their own, an immigrant would have to win roles in some way, and then become self-justifying his business and others. Somewhat impractical for a whore, go.
The conclusion is clear: the debate is the Aliens Act. Yes, yes, that is used against prostitution that feeds it. Is reducing the output immigrant women's labor, which the mafia throws unable to migrate independently, the brakes when they are raised to denounce their exploiters and abusers. An Immigration Act passed with the approval of most political and labor groups, and that much of the public calls for tightening. That is the frame. To those who defend it and allowed to talk about the rights of immigrant women and victims of trafficking they should drop their heads in shame.
0 comments:
Post a Comment